AIS Update July 2026
Not much has changed since October of 2025.
That, as of July 2026, is the story of the starry stonewort infestation in Middle Cullen.
Last October, when scuba divers conducted a perimeter survey, the infestation was about 6.4 acres. This summer, based on a perimeter survey conducted on June 26, the infestation has grown to about 6.9 acres. The small increase is due largely to some expansion along the northeast shoreline, where a narrow line of growth has become a bit wider.
The CLA used the June 26 survey by Blue Water Science of St. Paull as the basis for contracting with Lake Restoration, Inc. of Rogers, Minn., which applied a federally approved and state regulated copper algaecide/herbicide to algae shortly after the Fourth of July. A follow-up scuba survey will be conducted in a few weeks to assess the results of this treatment. A second treatment is planned for later this summer, and a third treatment will likely be conducted in September or October.
The CLA is largely following the starry stonewort treatment strategy it adopted last year, which is to hit it hard, hit it often and do what we can to keep it where it is. Unlike last year, we did forego a June treatment based on findings from last year that our June treatment wasn’t particularly effective. It wasn’t effective because the algae had not yet grown to a length where an algaecide could do a good job of knocking it back. So, this year, in a move to make member donations stretch further, we passed on the June treatment. This decision was supported by the DNR and several other starry stonewort experts.
Though some things remain similar to last year, one thing has changed. Last year, the CLA was part of a multi-organization study that aimed to determine what would happen if a lake association aggressively attacked a small starry stonewort infestation for at least two years. The DNR study included the CLA, Whitefish Area Property Owners Association, chemical manufacturer SEPRO and others. That study has ended prematurely, in part because at least two control lakes have opted out of the study, hence the DNR can no longer compare treated lakes to untreated lakes.
The DNR does intend to write-up a report based on one year’s data, and that information will be shared with you when it is available. While I don’t have details about the upcoming report, I do know it will state that the CLA’s efforts last year greatly reduced biomass and did reduce bulbils, the reproductive part of the algae. So, that’s positive.
